21st October 2014 

 
 News Front | Archives | Reviews | The Forum | Private Message | Links | Our Info |
     
News Headlines
Quick Summary

Happy New Year 2014!
Happy 2012 Everybody
iMod for Home Take II
iMod - Versatility for Home and Portable
Personal Audio Journey - Part III
Anthony Gallo Reference 3.1
Relentless Pursuit of Excellence.. Madness Part Deux!

Next >>

Table of Contents
Initial Impressions

Reviews

Diamond Viper V770 & Q3Test
Page 1 of 1
Author: wymun
Date of review: 16-May-1999
Type Of Review: Games

Initial Impressions
Ok. Have added a $4.00 fan (originally a 586 cooling fan) to the Viper 770's heatsink and did more benchmarking using Q3Test again. Here's the low-down:

Conditions used
Case open / ambient Motherboard temp of about 27 deg C. Overclocked it to 140/160 as base-line for all benchmarking before performing tests (comes default at 125/150).

Hardware
  • Celeron 300A-450
  • 128MB PC100 LGS RAM
  • CL V2 12MB SLI
  • Viper 770 + 32MB SDRAM (Eltrontech 6ns)
  • VL1025 ATM card
  • SBLive! Deluxe

Software
  • Viper770 latest drivers (12May) - version 4.10.01.0401. I'm not really sure which TNT reference drivers these are based on (1.73 / 1.76 / 1.81?)
  • Liveware 2.0 drivers
  • Q3test version 1.05

Benchmarks
Did the proposed "cg_drawfps 1; timedemo 1; demo q3test1" commands (thanks BK). Of course, do take this with a pinch of salt as it may not be truely reflective as rampantly pointed out in the net...Also, it was noted that the first timedemo always seems to be higher than subsequent timedemos performed without first exiting Q3test. Hence, the benchmarks below show the first timedemo run after restarting Q3test for each new clock setting...

Based on Tom's highest settings (ie. 32 bit mode / 32 bit textures / markings on walls enabled / Sky = high / Trilinear filtering / highest textures / 1024 x 768 / Lightmap / etc), received the following for the first timedemo for the various clock settings:-

1) At 140/160 = 29.7 fps
2) At 150/175 = 32.1 fps
3) At 150/183 = 33.7 fps
4) At 160/190 = 35.2 fps
5) At 160/200 = 36.7 fps
6) At 165/200 = 37.1 fps (with fan attached to V770)
7) At 170/190 = 35.1 fps (with fan attached to V770)
8) At 160/200 = 30.1 fps (resolution 1152 x 864 / all other settings being the same)

However, at 170 core, it was unstable and only managed to run 1 round of Q3Test timedemo - it hung the screen when I retired the timedemo. Hence, I guess the TNT2 chip has probably reached its max, stable core value achievable at about slightly < 170 core.

Again, I couldn't go beyond the 200 memory timing as Powerstrip restricts this. But it does seem that overclocking the memory does offer a decent jump in fps...

It is interesting to note how overclocking the memory seems to offer pretty significant jumps in frame-rate as compared to overclocking the core. Also, increasing the resolution to 1152 x 864 doesn't seem to drop the frame-rate that badly - so perhaps, I'm seeing a CPU limitation now....

Anyway, confirmed that the Viper770 doesn't support overlay with the Iomega Buz. However, BK just sent me a mail saying that it may be possible to do so at lower res of 640x480 (16bit).

Will probably run my TNT2 at 165/200 for now. Not a bad deal - for the price of a regular TNT2 chip, managed to clock it slightly above an Ulta-TNT2 chip spec...Guess I'm pretty satisfied with it....

Okay, guess it's back to Q3Test for now...!!



Main Menu


  Print this Review

  Mail this review to your friend

 

Review Index:

Reviews

Google

 

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2014 Hardware One. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy